<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Investing Step 10: Techniques</title>
	<atom:link href="http://personalfinanceandinvesting.com/archives/investing-step-10-techniques/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://personalfinanceandinvesting.com/archives/investing-step-10-techniques/</link>
	<description>Personal Finance, Investing and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:44:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://personalfinanceandinvesting.com/archives/investing-step-10-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalfinanceandinvesting.com/?p=321#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s a fair point that you certainly should not rebalance too often.  You don&#039;t want to cut off the upside of an asset class when it&#039;s just getting going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s a fair point that you certainly should not rebalance too often.  You don&#8217;t want to cut off the upside of an asset class when it&#8217;s just getting going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Equity Sweat</title>
		<link>http://personalfinanceandinvesting.com/archives/investing-step-10-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Equity Sweat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalfinanceandinvesting.com/?p=321#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Reallocation always sounds good on paper, but I find it often results in moving funds to under-performers just so that they can underperform some more.  Now when it comes to reallocating due to &quot;phase of life&quot; I&#039;m in 100% agreement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reallocation always sounds good on paper, but I find it often results in moving funds to under-performers just so that they can underperform some more.  Now when it comes to reallocating due to &#8220;phase of life&#8221; I&#8217;m in 100% agreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
